On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:44:34PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Nicolas Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > You're arguing for treating FV as extended/named attributes :)
> >
> > I think that'd be the right thing to do, since we have tools that are
> > aware of those already.  Of course, we're talking about somewhat magical
> > attributes, but I think that's fine (though, IIRC, NFSv4 [RFC3530] has
> > some strange verbiage limiting attributes to "applications").
> 
> I thought NFSv4 supports extended attributes. What "limiting" are you 
> aware of?

It does.  I meant this on pg. 12:

                                                 [...]  Named attributes
   are meant to be used by client applications as a method to associate
   application specific data with a regular file or directory.

and this on pg. 36:

   Named attributes are intended for data needed by applications rather
   than by an NFS client implementation.  NFS implementors are strongly
   encouraged to define their new attributes as recommended attributes
   by bringing them to the IETF standards-track process.

and this on pg. 232:

17.1.  Named Attribute Definition

   The NFS version 4 protocol provides for the association of named
   attributes to files.  The name space identifiers for these attributes
   are defined as string names.  The protocol does not define the
   specific assignment of the name space for these file attributes.
   Even though the name space is not specifically controlled to prevent
   collisions, an IANA registry has been created for the registration of
   NFS version 4 named attributes.  Registration will be achieved
   through the publication of an Informational RFC and will require not
   only the name of the attribute but the syntax and semantics of the
   named attribute contents; the intent is to promote interoperability
   where common interests exist.  While application developers are
   allowed to define and use attributes as needed, they are encouraged
   to register the attributes with IANA.


Nico
-- 
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to