On 8/7/06, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:19:14PM -1000, David J. Orman wrote:
>
> > (actually did they give OpenSolaris a name check at all when they
> > mentioned DTrace ?)
>
> Nope, not that I can see. Apple's pretty notorious for that kind of
> "oversight". I used to work for them, I know first hand how
> hat-tipping doesn't occur very often.
>
Before this progresses much further, it's worth noting that all of team
DTrace is at WWDC, has met with Apple engineers previously, and will be
involved in one or more presentations today. So while the marketing
department may not include OpenSolaris in the high level overview, Apple
is not ignoring the roots of DTrace, and will not be hiding this fact
from their developers (not that they could).
- Eric
Cool.
Let's see how it works out in the long run,
will we (the OpenSolaris community) get anything back from Apple and its community,
how well does CDDL work in the real world, etc. (we all know what happened to Darwin/BSD).
In terms of openness, Sun and Apple are going opposite directions IMHO, interesting situation :)
Tao
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
