On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:54:43AM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 26 October 2015 21:48:24 Jonathan Liu wrote:
> > On 26/10/2015 8:41 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Monday 26 October 2015 10:15:49 Andrei Gherzan wrote:
> > >> Hi Paul,
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:08:29AM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > >>> On Monday 26 October 2015 09:43:08 Jonathan Liu wrote:
> > >>>> [Support #16]
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>>
> > >>>> recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend | 6 ++++++
> > >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >>>> create mode 100644 recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --git a/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend
> > >>>> b/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend new file mode 100644
> > >>>> index 0000000..3e5e667
> > >>>> --- /dev/null
> > >>>> +++ b/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend
> > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > >>>> +do_configure_prepend_rpi() {
> > >>>> + cat > ${S}/mkspecs/oe-device-extra.pri << 'EOF'
> > >>>> +EGLFS_DEVICE_INTEGRATION = eglfs_brcm
> > >>>> +QMAKE_LIBS_EGL = -lEGL -lGLESv2
> > >>>> +EOF
> > >>>> +}
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm wondering if this is a good idea or not. I appreciate the intention,
> > >>> but does bbappending non-machine-specific recipes like this play well
> > >>> when you have other machines enabled in the same distro?
> > >>
> > >> But this change will be applied only for _rpi. How is this affecting
> > >> other
> > >> machines?
> > >
> > > If everything works such that the resulting packages get marked as
> > > machine-
> > > specific and the package manager correctly installs them in preference to
> > > the generic architecture packages on the machines in question, then there
> > > won't be a massive problem (though the side-effect is probably that any
> > > recipes depending on qtbase will also become machine-specific, that is
> > > possibly more of an issue).
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Paul
> >
> > Good point. The package arch needs to machine-specific. I will send a v3
> > to fix this.
>
> I think that will get taken care of automatically by virtue of the machine-
> specific override. My question is more about:machine-specific override to set PACKAGE_ARCH works only when it's used as subdirectory in SRC_URI, doesn't it? And it sets it only for qtbase, not all other recipes which depend on qtbase (see my other reply in this thread). > 1) Will that mechanism entirely work, including desired behaviours in both > the > build system and the package manager, and > > 2) Are any side-effects worth it? > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
