On 26/10/2015 10:28 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Jonathan Liu <net...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26/10/2015 7:08 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
It would rebuild qtbase (and recipes depending on it) without Raspberry Pi
support for other machines.
I see similar machine-specific do_configure_prepend elsewhere (e.g.
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/master/qt5-layer/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%25.bbappend).
Otavio, any thoughts on a better way to handle this?
We handle this moving it to a SoC subarch and using a dynamic package
arch handler to put every package depending on it as a subarch as
well. Ideally we could split the QPA module and build it separated. No
clue if it is possible or not.
So for meta-fsl-arm, would only the qtbase-plugins package be using
machine-specific arch and the other qtbase packages be using
non-machine-specific arch?
Or is it done on a per-recipe rather than per-package granularity?
Regards,
Jonathan
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
