On 26/10/2015 7:08 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Monday 26 October 2015 09:43:08 Jonathan Liu wrote:
[Support #16]
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <net...@gmail.com>
---
recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend
diff --git a/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend
b/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3e5e667
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%.bbappend
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+do_configure_prepend_rpi() {
+ cat > ${S}/mkspecs/oe-device-extra.pri << 'EOF'
+EGLFS_DEVICE_INTEGRATION = eglfs_brcm
+QMAKE_LIBS_EGL = -lEGL -lGLESv2
+EOF
+}
I'm wondering if this is a good idea or not. I appreciate the intention, but
does bbappending non-machine-specific recipes like this play well when you have
other machines enabled in the same distro?
Cheers,
Paul
It would rebuild qtbase (and recipes depending on it) without Raspberry
Pi support for other machines.
I see similar machine-specific do_configure_prepend elsewhere (e.g.
https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/master/qt5-layer/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%25.bbappend).
Otavio, any thoughts on a better way to handle this?
Regards,
Jonathan
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
