On 09/13/2016 01:26 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
I /think/ that what you say here is that you have, as a response to my
report, now replaced the code with some new code which, however, causes
some trouble inside Xerces which, however, is no problem since XMLmind
XML Editor ignores the "Unique Particle Attribution". Sounds good enough
for me!
Yes, we have replaced the old <figure> content model by the new <figure>
content model in XXE v7.2. Therefore the bug you have reported should be
fixed.
In my previous email, I tried to explain that, using a W3C XML
schema[*], there is no way to faithfully represent the grammar of XHTML5
as specified in https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/. A W3C XML schema can only
be a good approximation.
---
[*] I'm not sure that it's possible to faithfully represent the grammar
of XHTML5 using a RELAX NG schema. Yes, I know that a RELAX NG schema
exists, but is it 100% faithful to the spec?
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support
