Simon Cozens wrote:
My feeling is that it's time to accept the principle of "one to throw away" and finally put TeX82 out to pasture. Now we are blessed with a set of technologies which have proved themselves, which give great results on modern systems and have support for problems which were not even on the agenda thirty years ago. Just take your favourite scripting language, your favourite shaping engine, and your favourite output engine, stick the Knuth-Plass box-and-glue model, justification engine and page builder in the middle, glue them all together, and call it something new.
An interesting and (intentionally) provocative post, parts of the analysis within which I do not agree (e.g., NFSS and virtual fonts have nothing to do with any real or imagined deficiencies in MetaFont), but the real point I want challenge is the proposal to carry the page builder across. Asynchronous page breaking is one of the real weaknesses of TeX, preventing page breaks and paragraph format from interacting in any usable way. So, throw away TeX syntax if you want to (personally I do not, because I have spent 25 years learning it and loving it) but also replace the page builder model with an alternative that can feed back page-breaking decisions into the paragraph-building process.
Philip Taylor -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
