>greatly diminished. OpenType Math is still in a very early stage in XeTeX and
>has so many bugs that it is not ready for production use.
I think this is a wrong statement: OpenType Math is by itself in early stage.
Only
two-three products make use of it.
> - Of course ConTeXt mustn't be ignored. ConTeXt Mk IV, which is based on
>LuaTeX,
>
> seems to have everything that is missing from LaTeX: a stable, coherent
>interface, a well-designed
>
> architecture that makes LaTeX-style hacking and package clashes unnecessary,
>XML support,
>
> micro-typography, OpenType math, and much more.
Even if this true, why so few people use ConTeXt? IMHO, ConTeXt is more
difficult to learn and use
than LaTeX. In a final analysis, you cannot force people to use something just
because you
think it is better. You have to convince them and so far it seems they are not.
A.S.
----------------------
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
