On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:35:42PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote: > In fact this should rather be named "X86_FEATURE_TRUE", as this is its > semantics. > > And I think I can define it to the value 0xffff instead of using a > "real" bit for it.
A real bit is cheap - a special value to pay attention to in the future
not so much. Also we do have X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS already which has a
similar purpose...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
