On 11.09.19 17:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.09.2019 17:06, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 11.09.19 17:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.09.2019 15:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
And with the idea to "mount" it in the dom0 kernel's sysfs I think
xensysfs (or xenhypfs?) seems appropriate.
Well, such "mounting" is going to be indirect, I would assume?
I.e. not directly forward filesystem like requests as such to
Xen?
For plain entries (reads and eventually writes) I surely would just
forward them. In case this is possible for directories, too, I'd rather
do no caching in the kernel, so forwarding them would seem to be
appropriate (rejecting anything but reading a directory, of course).
But that's still a kernel based file system, simply taking its
data from Xen. It's not like file system requests as such would
be forwarded.
True.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
