On 11.09.2019 17:06, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 11.09.19 17:01, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 11.09.2019 15:01, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> And with the idea to "mount" it in the dom0 kernel's sysfs I think >>> xensysfs (or xenhypfs?) seems appropriate. >> >> Well, such "mounting" is going to be indirect, I would assume? >> I.e. not directly forward filesystem like requests as such to >> Xen? > > For plain entries (reads and eventually writes) I surely would just > forward them. In case this is possible for directories, too, I'd rather > do no caching in the kernel, so forwarding them would seem to be > appropriate (rejecting anything but reading a directory, of course).
But that's still a kernel based file system, simply taking its data from Xen. It's not like file system requests as such would be forwarded. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
