On 11.09.19 13:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.09.2019 13:29, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 11.09.19 13:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Second, is xenfs really the best name here? It is ambiguous with the
still-essential (even though it really needs to disappear) Linux
filesystem by the name xenfs.
Yes, I'm aware of that ambiguity. I'm absolutely in favor of finding a
better name.
Maybe xensysfs?
Or just xensys (albeit that's likely getting ambiguous)? I'm
not fully convinced calling this a file system is a good idea.
Windows' name-value pair store is called registry, for
example, despite it also resembling a file system to a certain
degree.
"Registry" doesn't seem correct regarding the potential dynamically
generated entries.
And with the idea to "mount" it in the dom0 kernel's sysfs I think
xensysfs (or xenhypfs?) seems appropriate.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
