On 26/10/2018 16:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 26.10.18 at 16:51, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 26/10/2018 15:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 26.10.18 at 16:22, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> On 26/10/2018 14:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 15.10.18 at 12:36, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>>>>>> @@ -323,6 +323,18 @@ void free_vcpu_struct(struct vcpu *v)
>>>>>> free_xenheap_page(v);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +/* Initialise various registers to their architectural INIT/RESET
>>>>>> state. */
>>>>>> +void arch_vcpu_regs_init(struct vcpu *v)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + v->arch.user_regs = (typeof(v->arch.user_regs)){
>>>>>> + .rflags = X86_EFLAGS_MBS,
>>>>>> + };
>>>>> Sadly this initializer broke the build once again for gcc 4.3.x.
>>>> Oh - that's unfortunate. I guess it will need a memset instead.
>>> Or we finally need to bump the minimum version we're happy with.
>>>
>>>>> (As a side note, using .eflags instead of .rflags would have a
>>>>> fair chance of an omitted REX prefix.)
>>>> You specifically requested rflags over eflags in your previous review.
>>> Did I? I haven't been able to find v1 of this patch at all in the archives
>>> (going back to May), or in my inbox (using just part of the title for
>>> searching). Was that posted in private, or under a different title? I'm
>>> trying to figure why I would have asked for that...
>> <5b17e80a02000078001c8...@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
> Hmm, yes, except that my mail client doesn't allow me to search for
> mail IDs, or at least I don't know how I would do that. You don't
> happen to have title, time stamp, or mail archive ref?
"Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: Initialise debug registers correctly", sent
06/06/2018, 14:56
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
