On 24.06.2025 09:31, dm...@proton.me wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:50:33AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 24.06.2025 05:56, dm...@proton.me wrote: >>> From: Denis Mukhin <dmuk...@ford.com> >>> >>> Move PL011 emulator to the new location for UART emulators. >>> >>> No functional change intended. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin <dmuk...@ford.com> >>> --- >>> xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 ------- >>> xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 - >>> xen/drivers/Kconfig | 2 ++ >>> xen/drivers/Makefile | 1 + >>> xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> xen/drivers/vuart/Makefile | 1 + >>> .../arm/vpl011.c => drivers/vuart/vuart-pl011.c} | 0 >>> 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig >>> create mode 100644 xen/drivers/vuart/Makefile >>> rename xen/{arch/arm/vpl011.c => drivers/vuart/vuart-pl011.c} (100%) >> >> I question the placement under drivers/. To me, driver != emulator. I >> wonder what others think. But yes, we already have drivers/vpci/. That >> may want moving then ... > > re: driver != emulator: I agree; but I followed drivers/vpci. > > Do you think common/vuart would be a better location?
Or maybe common/emul/... This wants discussing, I think. Jan