On 24.06.2025 09:36, dm...@proton.me wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:53:04AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 24.06.2025 05:57, dm...@proton.me wrote: >>> --- a/xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig >>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig >>> @@ -3,6 +3,15 @@ config HAS_VUART >>> >>> if (ARM_32 || ARM_64) >>> >>> +config HAS_VUART_MMIO >>> + bool "Simple MMIO-based emulated UART support" >> >> Perhaps in a separate change this should be renamed. HAS_* should never >> have prompts. > > Oh, so HAS_ flags are non-interactive selectors by design?
Well "has" simply by the word means "this is available". Any user-selectable item deriving from the mere availability would then have a "depends on HAS_...", thus hiding the option in situation where the functionality isn't available (be it per arch or for other reasons). Jan
