On Wed Apr 9, 2025 at 7:34 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 08.04.2025 18:07, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> @@ -1010,15 +1010,15 @@ static struct domain *__init create_dom0(struct
>> boot_info *bi)
>> dom0_cfg.flags |= XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_iommu;
>>
>> /* Create initial domain. Not d0 for pvshim. */
>> - domid = get_initial_domain_id();
>> - d = domain_create(domid, &dom0_cfg, pv_shim ? 0 : CDF_privileged);
>> + bd->domid = get_initial_domain_id();
>> + d = domain_create(bd->domid, &dom0_cfg, pv_shim ? 0 : CDF_privileged);
>> if ( IS_ERR(d) )
>> - panic("Error creating d%u: %ld\n", domid, PTR_ERR(d));
>> + panic("Error creating d%u: %ld\n", bd->domid, PTR_ERR(d));
>>
>> init_dom0_cpuid_policy(d);
>>
>> if ( alloc_dom0_vcpu0(d) == NULL )
>> - panic("Error creating d%uv0\n", domid);
>> + panic("Error creating %pd vcpu 0\n", d);
>
> And why exactly is this not %pdv0?
Likely to avoid what looks like a highly cryptic format specifier. But I
agree your option seems nicer.
> That's what would be possible to catch by
> grep-ing for what vsnprintf() would emit for %pv. Preferably with that
> adjusted
> (which can be done while committing):
Yes, please.
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Thanks
>
> Jan
Cheers,
Alejandro
