On 10.04.2025 15:09, Daniel P. Smith wrote: > On 4/9/25 02:24, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 08.04.2025 18:07, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: >>> From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com> >>> >>> To begin moving toward allowing the hypervisor to construct more than one >>> domain at boot, a container is needed for a domain's build information. >>> Introduce a new header, <xen/asm/bootdomain.h>, that contains the initial >>> struct boot_domain that encapsulate the build information for a domain. >>> >>> Add a kernel and ramdisk boot module reference along with a struct domain >>> reference to the new struct boot_domain. This allows a struct boot_domain >>> reference to be the only parameter necessary to pass down through the domain >>> construction call chain. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andr...@amd.com> >> >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > I have to object because the meaningless rename is going cause > significant pain in the rebase of the follow-on series for no improved > code clarity.
Sorry, then an incremental patch undoing the rename that happened (with appropriate justification) will need proposing - the patch here has gone in already. Jan
