On 08.04.2025 18:07, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>
> 
> To begin moving toward allowing the hypervisor to construct more than one
> domain at boot, a container is needed for a domain's build information.
> Introduce a new header, <xen/asm/bootdomain.h>, that contains the initial
> struct boot_domain that encapsulate the build information for a domain.
> 
> Add a kernel and ramdisk boot module reference along with a struct domain
> reference to the new struct boot_domain. This allows a struct boot_domain
> reference to be the only parameter necessary to pass down through the domain
> construction call chain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andr...@amd.com>

Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/boot-domain.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Apertus Solutions, LLC
> + * Author: Daniel P. Smith <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com>
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Christopher Clark <christopher.w.cl...@gmail.com>
> + */

I wonder if the 2024-s here shouldn't have been amended by 2025 now. (I'm
also, more generally, unclear about the purpose of such, especially when
the file is really small and simple. It's only going to go stale, as we
can see from various other files having such copyright lines.)

Jan

Reply via email to