On 26.02.2025 14:03, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > > On 2/26/25 11:50 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 26.02.2025 11:45, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: >>> @@ -34,6 +40,9 @@ The format is based on [Keep a >>> Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/) >>> - On x86: >>> - xl suspend/resume subcommands. >>> - `wallclock` command line option to select time source. >>> + - Add Support for Paging-Write Feature. >> That EPT (i.e. Intel) only, which may want making explicit? > > Agree, it would be better to write: "Add support forEPT paging-write feature".
"Intel EPT" perhaps, for the same reason as using "AMD" below. >>> + - Zen5 support (including new hardware support to mitigate the SRSO >>> + speculative vulnerability). >> I'd also suggest to qualify Zen5 with AMD. > > I thought that it is clear just from the name for a CPU microachitecture: > Zen5 which > I expect to be develop by AMD. Anyway, if it is really better I will add AMD > before Zen5. > >> Whether to mention this here >> when I think I backported all the pieces isn't entirely clear to me either. > > What is the better place then? The question isn't where to put it, but whether to in the first place. Jan
