On 07.01.2025 18:18, Petr Beneš wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 5:46 PM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >> Hmm ... Instead of you touching the bit in every one of the case blocks, >> I was expecting you to clear the bit ahead of the switch(), accepting a >> double update in the p2m_access_r_pw case. > > I did consider it, but ultimately didn't like the double-update. > Similarly, the switch-case above does also set each bit in the > "case-s" individually. But I understand it's more justified there.
Right - it's setting them to all different combinations each time. > However, if you insist, I'll fix it. Please do; it helps readability quite a bit in this case, imo. Jan
