On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 5:46 PM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > Hmm ... Instead of you touching the bit in every one of the case blocks, > I was expecting you to clear the bit ahead of the switch(), accepting a > double update in the p2m_access_r_pw case.
I did consider it, but ultimately didn't like the double-update. Similarly, the switch-case above does also set each bit in the "case-s" individually. But I understand it's more justified there. However, if you insist, I'll fix it. P.
