From: h...@lst.de <h...@lst.de> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 8:25 AM > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 02:59:03PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote: > > Conceptually, it's still being used as a boolean function based on > > whether the return value is NULL. Renaming it to swiotlb_get_pool() > > more accurately describes the return value, but obscures the > > intent of determining if it is a swiotlb buffer. I'll think about it. > > Suggestions are welcome. > > Just keep is_swiotlb_buffer as a trivial inline helper that returns > bool.
I don't understand what you are suggesting. Could you elaborate a bit? is_swiotlb_buffer() can't be trivial when CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC is set. Michael