On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:58:13PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote: > > This patch trades off making many of the core swiotlb APIs take > > an additional argument in order to avoid duplicating calls to > > swiotlb_find_pool(). The current code seems rather wasteful in > > making 6 calls per round-trip, but I'm happy to accept others' > > judgment as to whether getting rid of the waste is worth the > > additional code complexity. > > Quick ping on this RFC. Is there any interest in moving forward? > Quite a few lines of code are affected because of adding the > additional "pool" argument to several functions, but the change > is conceptually pretty simple.
Yes, this looks sensible to me. I'm tempted to apply it.
