Hi Jan,
On 05/22/2018 10:22 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.05.18 at 10:51, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
On 05/22/2018 07:34 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> 05/22/18 2:53 AM >>>
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ config HAS_SCIF
or Renesas R-Car Gen 2/3 based board say Y.
>
config HAS_EHCI
- bool
+ bool "EHCI UART driver"
... here iirc Julien had already pointed out that the drivers should not become
optional on x86, i.e. in the former case you want to attach a conditional to the
prompt while in the latter case I don't see why you add the prompt in the first
place if you mean to make it x86-specific. Which by itself is questionable
though: Why would this driver be x86-specific, when so far it (consciously)
hasn't been? If anything I could see it depend on HAS_PCI.
I don't expect this piece of hardware to come up on Arm.
I can read two meanings into this: You expect the driver to not work on
ARM, or you're confident the EHCI protocol of accessing USB host
controller hardware not used anywhere in devices used on ARM. Which
of the two you mean determines what the correct approach here is.
I am quite confident the EHCI protocol is not used on Arm.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
