>>> On 22.05.18 at 10:51, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote: > On 05/22/2018 07:34 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> 05/22/18 2:53 AM >>> >>> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ config HAS_SCIF >>> or Renesas R-Car Gen 2/3 based board say Y. >> > >>> config HAS_EHCI >>> - bool >>> + bool "EHCI UART driver" >> >> ... here iirc Julien had already pointed out that the drivers should not >> become >> optional on x86, i.e. in the former case you want to attach a conditional to >> the >> prompt while in the latter case I don't see why you add the prompt in the >> first >> place if you mean to make it x86-specific. Which by itself is questionable >> though: Why would this driver be x86-specific, when so far it (consciously) >> hasn't been? If anything I could see it depend on HAS_PCI. > > I don't expect this piece of hardware to come up on Arm.
I can read two meanings into this: You expect the driver to not work on ARM, or you're confident the EHCI protocol of accessing USB host controller hardware not used anywhere in devices used on ARM. Which of the two you mean determines what the correct approach here is. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
