>>> On 09.03.17 at 18:29, <ta...@tklengyel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >> However - is this interface supposed to be usable by a guest on itself? >> Arguably the same question would apply to some of the other sub-ops >> too, but anyway. > > AFAIK the only op the guest would use on itself is > HVMOP_altp2m_vcpu_enable_notify.
Which then means we should move all of them out of here, into a suitable domctl. That will in turn reduce the scope of the bogus interface versioning, which Andrew did point out, quite a bit. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
