On 01/05/2017 10:56 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.12.16 at 06:45, <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com> wrote:
Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
We should call the destroy functions in the the reverse order here.
Double "the". And to quote from my RFC reply:
"Also the ordering issue extends to other calls, and I think if at all
possible we should then do all the teardown in reverse order of
init."
Is there anything preventing this?
Jan
Ah, sorry. I didn't get what you tried to say earlier. I see now that
you want to change the teardown order in hvm_vcpu_destroy() to follow
the teardown order (i.e. the "failX:") in hvm_vcpu_initialize().
Thanks,
Suravee
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
