Since vlapic_init() is called before vcpu_initialise().
We should call the destroy functions in the the reverse order here.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>
Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
index 25dc759..d573f0f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -1613,10 +1613,10 @@ void hvm_vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v)
tasklet_kill(&v->arch.hvm_vcpu.assert_evtchn_irq_tasklet);
hvm_vcpu_cacheattr_destroy(v);
+ hvm_funcs.vcpu_destroy(v);
+
if ( is_hvm_vcpu(v) )
vlapic_destroy(v);
-
- hvm_funcs.vcpu_destroy(v);
}
void hvm_vcpu_down(struct vcpu *v)
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
