> >>> On 12.12.16 at 11:35, <luwei.k...@intel.com> wrote: > > If a counter happend overflow just clear corresponding bit of > > IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL, rather than clear all the bit of this msr. > > The code change is fine, but the description appears to be wrong: > Isn't the change to avoid bits getting wrongly set, rather than any getting > wrongly cleared? > just set the corresponding bits of which counter happened overflow, rather than set all the available bits of IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL when happened pmu interrupt. Or Remove the redundant bits set of IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL.
Is that OK? Thank, Luwei Kang _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel