Rob Hoes writes ("[PATCH RFC 9/9] libxl: introduce specific error codes in
libxl_device_nic_add"):
> Signed-off-by: Rob Hoes <rob.h...@citrix.com>
...
> + # NIC parameters could not be determined
> + (ENUM_PREV, "NIC_SCRIPT_UNDETERMINED"),
> + (ENUM_PREV, "NIC_DEVID_UNDETERMINED"),
Perhaps we could have a coherent naming scheme ? These are invalid
parameter errors, aren't they ? That is, libxl's caller specified
something wrong.
So maybe
INVALID_NIC_SCRIPT_UNDETERMINED
?
What do others think ?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
