Following the proposal from Euan Harris to improve libxl's error reporting [1], I have written a first couple of patches that I would like some feedback on. The focus of these patches is on improving the errors that can be raised by the device_add functions and some related ones.
Does the approach look acceptable? Do the error codes make sense? Did I miss any error conditions? One thing I wasn't sure about is what happens if libxl__wait_device_connection times out. Also, I realise that these patches essentially break backward compatibility, and I have not done the "#define LIBXL_HAVE" stuff yet. Do people consider this necessary, and if so, at what granularity (e.g. one LIBXL_HAVE for all new error codes in a release)? Thanks, Rob [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02572.html _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
