On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 11:43 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 17/06/15 11:14, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 16:06 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> On 16/06/15 16:04, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 14:44 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >>>> Libxl has now been fully adjusted not to need them. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > >>> > >>> /me looks mournfully at the #28 shaped hole in this series which would > >>> nuke all the migration v1 code from libxc :-) > >> I was going to slip that into v2. I didn't want to delay posting v1 for > >> review, given the proximity of the 4.6 freeze. > >> > >> I think I will transcribe the description of the legacy protocol from > >> xg_save_restore.h > > That would be good, thanks. > > > >> and code up the legacy protocol in python. > > That would be above and beyond, but don't let me stop you ;-) > > Well - it is currently coded up with magic numbers in the conversion > script. All I was planning to do was make some numbers less magic.
That does sound nice, thanks. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
