On 17/06/15 11:14, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 16:06 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 16/06/15 16:04, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 14:44 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>> Libxl has now been fully adjusted not to need them. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> >>> >>> /me looks mournfully at the #28 shaped hole in this series which would >>> nuke all the migration v1 code from libxc :-) >> I was going to slip that into v2. I didn't want to delay posting v1 for >> review, given the proximity of the 4.6 freeze. >> >> I think I will transcribe the description of the legacy protocol from >> xg_save_restore.h > That would be good, thanks. > >> and code up the legacy protocol in python. > That would be above and beyond, but don't let me stop you ;-)
Well - it is currently coded up with magic numbers in the conversion script. All I was planning to do was make some numbers less magic. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
