On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:02:33AM +0100, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 16:58 +0100 on 23 Aug (1503507504), Wei Liu wrote: > > After 404595352 ("x86/paging: Enforce PG_external == PG_translate == > > PG_refcounts"), PG_refcounts and PG_translate always need to be set > > together. > > > > Squash PG_refcounts to simplify code. All calls paging_mode_refcounts > > are replaced by calls to paging_mode_translate. > > Would it be a good idea to merge all three and have only PG_external? >
My reverse-engineering is that when PV guest is migrated it has PG_external and (the new) PG_translate. I would be happy to squash all three into one if you tell me I'm wrong. :-) > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > > Acked-by: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> > > with one adjustment: > > > /* common paging mode bits */ > > #define PG_mode_shift 10 > > -/* Refcounts based on shadow tables instead of guest tables */ > > -#define PG_refcounts (XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_ENABLE_REFCOUNT << PG_mode_shift) > > /* Enable log dirty mode */ > > #define PG_log_dirty (XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_ENABLE_LOG_DIRTY << > > PG_mode_shift) > > /* Xen does p2m translation, not guest */ > > Please add "and handles refcounts" to the comment describing PG_translate. > Sure. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel