porting to SDL is really in a good way :-) One of the things left to
do is the port of the menu option, do you think we should use Paragui
and rewrite it from scratch or should we port the button, listbox,
... classes to SDL and then port the menu option ?
I don't know... I have posted a message in the paragui forum ~1 month
ago to ask wihich version of paragui is the best to rely on. And I
have only one reply from a man that use paragui unstable branch for
his project and recommand to use the unstable branch because the API
is easier to understand...
http://www.bms-austria.com/projects/paragui/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=107
But no response about API stability and others crtiteria. So I am not
convinced that paragui is a perfect solution (but perhaps that paragui
is the best we have)
That is why I am not very active theese days, I am seeing about the
feasibilty of implementing a gui... [->future]
But for the present, perhaps the best solution is to port the gui
stuff of wormux. I have already done a part as my first try to port
wormux included the gui even if I have not comitted it since I have
seen that we use paragui for that.
Ok, so I will port the "old" version of options menu _without_ using
paragui.
On the clanlib version, we do not use the clangui because its design is
ugly, so we are able to not use paragui at all, perhaps it will be the way.
Matt
PS: Jean-Christophe, do you still have some problems with paragui ?
Yes, with the 1.1.7 and the 1.1.8 version of paragui. Background is
not displayed. It seems that as I increase the resolution of the
wormux window the background is more and more displayed.
Jean-Christophe
