2014-03-28 20:32 GMT+01:00 Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com>:
> > > On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 2014-03-28 16:34 GMT+01:00 Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com>: > >> >> The bugs are listed here: >> http://www.lua.org/bugs.html >> >> 5.2.3 was only released this past December, but 5.2.2 has been out since >> 2012. >> >> What do you mean by "we have a 5.2.1 library for Windows but not a 5.2.3 >> one"? Do you mean from some pre-built binary repository somewhere? >> >> > Yes exactly. Right now our binaries seem to come from > http://luabinaries.sourceforge.net/download.html (Gerald will confirm). > > > Huh. I figured they were just being built from source. At my day job we > just build the whole thing in statically, but we had to use our own anyway > because we made some changes to the Lua engine to protect against bad Lua > code, and we don't allow people to swap it out as a shared library/dll. > > > http://lua-users.org/wiki/LuaBinaries web page suggests to go to > http://joedf.users.sourceforge.net/luabuilds/ for a 5.2.3 pre compiled > binary but it does not include the header files. I guess I could get them > from the source package. > > > Yup. > Hi, I just upgraded the Windows build system in ga1d4189 so as to use Lua 5.2.1. If required, we might change it to 5.2.3 later. Cheers, Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
