+1 The Debian packages use Lua since 1.10.2-2 without any problem. Cheers, Balint
2014-03-28 15:45 GMT+01:00 Nakayama Kenjiro <nakayamakenj...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com> > wrote: >> >> Howdy, >> Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua >> 5.2? Right now the automated builds are getting built with 5.1. >> >> There's very little difference to end users (i.e., older scripts should >> continue to work)... but for the C-code it's a lot more painful to have to >> continue to handle both Lua versions, and it takes longer to test, fix, etc. >> There's no real advantage to supporting both at this point, afaik. There >> was back when Lua 5.2 was new and buggy, but 5.2 has been out since 2011. >> >> -hadriel >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> >> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > -- > Kenjiro NAKAYAMA <nakayamakenj...@gmail.com> > GPG Key fingerprint = ED8F 049D E67A 727D 9A44 8E25 F44B E208 C946 5EB9 > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
