If 5.2 has been out for three years at this point it sounds fine to me.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kap...@oracle.com> wrote: > Howdy, > Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua 5.2? > Right now the automated builds are getting built with 5.1. > > There's very little difference to end users (i.e., older scripts should > continue to work)... but for the C-code it's a lot more painful to have to > continue to handle both Lua versions, and it takes longer to test, fix, etc. > There's no real advantage to supporting both at this point, afaik. There was > back when Lua 5.2 was new and buggy, but 5.2 has been out since 2011. > > -hadriel > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
