Dan Kegel wrote: > jwhite wrote: >> The attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case. >> Does this seem like a reasonable approach to folks? > > I like it. > > I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about > letting people build wine without a full complement > of development headers. Maybe our configure > should have a sanity check at the end, and abort > if something optional but very common is missing; > we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable > configuring in that case if it's really intended. > - Dan > IMHO configure should abort if any of the required libraries are missing and '--without-<bar>' flag was not given. Pretty much anything that prints out warning if it was not found.
Hopefully this will prevent broken builds and invalid bug/problem reports. Vitaliy.
