On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about >> letting people build wine without a full complement >> of development headers. Maybe our configure >> should have a sanity check at the end, and abort >> if something optional but very common is missing; >> we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable >> configuring in that case if it's really intended. > > We could have dotests check the config.log to see if there were any > dependencies missing, and warn/fail as appropriate.
That only helps dotests. I'm thinking we should increase build quality of wine for other situations, too.
