On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > jwhite wrote: >> The attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case. >> Does this seem like a reasonable approach to folks? > > I like it. > > I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about > letting people build wine without a full complement > of development headers. Maybe our configure > should have a sanity check at the end, and abort > if something optional but very common is missing; > we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable > configuring in that case if it's really intended. > - Dan > > >
We could have dotests check the config.log to see if there were any dependencies missing, and warn/fail as appropriate.
