Then they should wait for the review before apologising. Or they could just apologise for those things they already know they did wrong. An apology that doesn't say what you are apologising for is meaningless, so why say it? On Oct 14, 2012 12:15 PM, "David Gerard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14 October 2012 12:12, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If they don't know what they've done wrong, what are they apologising > for? > > > There is, of course, an inquiry underway on that precise question. > > I think you would be complaining had they said anything or nothing. > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
