On 6 Aug 2012, at 08:11, WilliamH wrote: > Because the blog post response to The Daily Telegraph article wrote that > "“The Board is united in the view that this decision does not affect his role > as a Trustee of the charity." > > Then again my conclusion was only an inference based on a sequence of events. > I take it you still stand by that comment?
Indeed, his role as a trustee was, and still is, unaffected by arbcom's decision. It was his role as Chair that (sadly) became untenable. Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
