Got it. I find it odd that Ashley grasped the incompatibility of his position before the rest of the board did, and more to the point, that they only did grasp it *after* he stepped down. Of those who signed the EGM, what are your views on that?
WH. On 6 August 2012 01:19, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 August 2012 01:11, WilliamH <william.wiki.ad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I see that the EGM call has been closed as unsuccessful. Do calls like > that have a legal expiry date based on their opening, or was it just > considered stale? > > Calls like that don't have any legal meaning - the law only talks > about the actual request with all the signatures being sent to the > company. How you go about getting those signatures is up to you. I > blanked it because it became clear it wasn't going to reach 13 > signatures. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
