Because the blog post response to The Daily Telegraph article wrote that
"“The Board is united in the view that this decision does not affect his
role as a Trustee of the charity."
Then again my conclusion was only an inference based on a sequence of
events. I take it you still stand by that comment?
WH.
On 6 August 2012 05:10, Michael Peel <michael.p...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 5 Aug 2012, at 18:34, WilliamH wrote:
>
> I find it odd that Ashley grasped the incompatibility of his position
> before the rest of the board did, and more to the point, that they only did
> grasp it *after* he stepped down.
>
>
> {{citation needed}}. I'm curious to know why you think this?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
