On 25 June 2012 20:10, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 June 2012 19:48, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> > wrote: > > OK, I have an answer of sorts. To me fixing the SSL looks urgent. So one > > could say that paying the going commercial rate to have it fixed, by > someone > > who knows what he or she is doing, is a good idea. Then the hiring of a > > technical person (I think a CTO is needed right now, not a dev, but that > > appears to be a minority view) could proceed uncluttered by that > decision. > > What you are telling me, Tom, is that this is not the way the Board > thinks. > > I don't see how the decision about hiring a technical staffer is > "cluttered" by the fact that we have jobs we need the technical staff > to do... if there weren't such jobs, we wouldn't be hiring someone to > do them. > > Well, Mike has explained the current position now, so we don't need the labour the hypotheticals. I only wish I had the technical chops to be reassured. Charles
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
