SSL might be a bad example. It's only a couple of hours work to fix; I offered to do it once.
Tom Morton On 25 Jun 2012, at 19:18, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote: On 25 June 2012 18:49, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It may surprise you to hear that Mike was the one arguing for contractors, > so this certainly isn't a matter of refusing to budge from your first > decision. > Is Mike's view that having a contractor in to fix the SSL problem would cost too much generally shared? The SSL does impact on the credibility of the fundraiser, which raised £1M last time and one would hope that number would go up in future. As a percentage of one year's take, what is "too much"? Charles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
