On 04/01/2012 10:19, James Farrar wrote: > Perhaps someone just went off the number of members in the room, not > realising that those present by proxy counted towards quorum. > > Speaking as a Teller for the three meetings in question, I never > really had any concerns about quorum at any of them, above and beyond > the normal level where it's the first thing you keep an eye on. > Certainly for the EGM I was relaxed about quorum being met from as > early as 27th September, 19 days before the meeting. > > 10% really isn't an onerous requirement with proxy votes counting. Thanks James. Very good to hear your reporting of those meetings and your views.
Gordo -- Gordon Joly [email protected] http://www.joly.org.uk/ Don't Leave Space To The Professionals! _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
