If I misread that part, my apologies. That still doesn't change the core issue, that money is being offered, and that it's being offered for quantity rather than quality.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Gergo Tisza <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Todd Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This project is going for 100k articles. There are as of this writing 118 > > editors signed up. That is, even if we presume 100% participation (which > is > > generally wildly optimistic), nearly 1000 articles per editor to reach > that > > goal. If somehow that does happen, there are four judges who would need > to > > review, if the goal is reached, 25000 articles each. Those are not > > realistic numbers. > > > > Come on. Did you even read the page you are talking about? Clearly you are > confusing it with the 100,000 Challange [1] which starts at the same time > but is a much larger project (the project page mentions a two-year > timeframe). > > > [1] > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_ > in_Red/The_100,000_Challenge > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
