There's also this: http://www.create.ac.uk/blog/2013/05/06/orphans-much-ado-about-what/
-- Tom Morris <http://tommorris.org/> On Saturday, 4 May 2013 at 16:32, Luis Villa wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > 2013/5/2 David Gerard <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>: > > > On 2 May 2013 04:06, shi zhao <[email protected] > > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > > > > see http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/ > > > > > > > > > As usual, Orlowski is trolling for clicks. Here's the actual text: > > > > > > http://niaccurshi.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/orphan-works-enterprise-and-regulatory.html > > > > And The Economist POV: > > > > http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2013/05/orphan-works > > Another, more considered, piece, from Andres Guadamuz: > > http://www.technollama.co.uk/has-the-uk-abolished-copyright-analysis-of-new-orphan-work-legislation > > > -- > Luis Villa > Deputy General Counsel > Wikimedia Foundation > 415.839.6885 ext. 6810 > > NOTICE: This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you > have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about > the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for > legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a > lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their > personal capacity. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
